Bharatiya Pathshala
Opening preparation notes...
Bharatiya Pathshala
Opening preparation notes...
Decision Making / Ethics
Ethics, Fairness and Values: concepts, worked examples and practice.
Listen and follow along. Progress stays on this browser. No login needed.
Start with the basics
Ethical reasoning compares choices using honesty, fairness, responsibility and their effects on others.
You find a classmate’s lost pencil case. What action respects their ownership?
Remember: An action being convenient does not make it fair.
Log in to save highlights and answer practice questions. Select text in a note, then choose a highlight colour. On mobile, touch and hold to select. Choose Save highlights or Save changes to save to your account. You’ll be prompted before leaving unsaved study changes.
Identify stakeholders, legitimate objectives and constraints. Compare fairness, feasibility and long-term consequences before selecting an action.
Compare actions against honesty, fairness and responsibility. Avoid treating personal loyalty as a reason to conceal wrongdoing.
Explain the idea in your own words before opening the answer. Then apply it to the example.
Explain the main rule in ethical dilemmas, then apply it to a small example. State the assumption that makes your reasoning valid.
Review the noteAn ethical dilemma involves competing legitimate interests or duties. Separate a hard choice from an option that is simply dishonest or harmful.
Worked example: A manager finds a safety defect before a deadline. Concealing it protects the deadline but violates a basic duty of care. Pause affected work, document evidence and escalate through a responsible process.
Explain the main rule in fairness and integrity, then apply it to a small example. State the assumption that makes your reasoning valid.
Review the noteFairness requires relevant, consistent criteria and a chance to be heard. Integrity means not hiding facts or applying rules only when convenient.
Worked example: Two applicants meet the same published criteria. Favouring a relative without disclosure is not fair. Declare the conflict and use an independent assessment based on the criteria.
Explain the main rule in stakeholders and consequences, then apply it to a small example. State the assumption that makes your reasoning valid.
Review the noteList people affected directly and indirectly, including those without decision power. Compare harm, benefits, reversibility and long-term trust.
Worked example: Closing a service may save money but harm users with no alternative. Compare a reduced service, targeted subsidy and phased closure before assuming the cheapest option is best.
BEGINNER
A convenient action is not automatically fair to the owner.
Source record: Bharatiya Pathshala — original illustrated lessons.